[Performance Analysis:] MAN IN THE MIRROR, Golders Green Hippodrome, London.
- The Live Performance Mentor
- Mar 24
- 4 min read
Updated: Mar 31
Man in the Mirror is an excellent performance with striking visuals and enjoyable choreography. Particularly exceptional is the makeup, which captured Michael Jackson’s likeness superbly and was longevous, though fading slightly at the midway-point of the performance. A wonderful array of Michael Jackson’s songs are included, sweeping through his various eras, which are each reflected well in set, video and costume design [though I would have liked even more variety from this latter]. Whilst the function of audience interactivity could be improved upon, performer "CJ" himself has excellent grounded presence, corporeal awareness and exudes [vocalised] respect for his work, which is commendable.
Choreography is sharp and intentional, certainly reminiscent of Michael Jackson’s performances with distinct movements calling from his dance repertoire. Costume has also been chosen well to complement movement — as well as aesthetic. Ensemble synchronicity could be improved, however, across all the dancers, and whilst the Stage-Right side of the band are vitalised and demonstrative, the Stage-Left side seem less enthused in their facial and bodily expressivity, which compromises Upstage activity significantly. CJ’s wife stands out as exemplary for her lip-syncing abilities; I would urge the other dancers to note how she locks her head into position when lip-syncing towards a microphone on a stand. Without this locking in, it is clear that the backing vocals are not coming from the onstage performers, as the dancers’ mouths are nowhere near the correct position for sound to be picked up.
Still with regard to choreography: in particular, with the original ‘Thriller’ having so iconic a choreography, heavily culturally studied and, most significantly, a collective work, it was quite disappointing to see how unstructured this rendition was and that CJ spent most of the song alone, pacing back and forth on the stage, repeating the same, relatively simple movements. A quicker costume change here or a rearrangement of titles would ease this — I see no reason, for example, why this song could not have followed ‘Billie Jean’. On the topic of ‘Billie Jean’’s choreography itself, small hiccups are sometimes negligible, but I would urge CJ to further rehearse placing the suitcase down upon the stool, as its dropping off compromised an otherwise deliberate and tension-driven overture for this song. Beyond this, for CJ himself, his movements are precise throughout, if a little underperformed [I imagine from the regular over-repetition of these throughout his career].
My top two major concerns for this performance are CJ’s diction and [a venue-specific issue] technical issues. Particularly when performing higher-note titles, words are often completely lost, but this is redeemed by excellent vocal control and faultless energy as well as by an exceptional recreation of Michael Jackson’s familiar vocal isms: his percussive breaths, exclamations, yelps, etc. Technical issues here refer solely to the volume of the microphones. Sound was heavily distorted by the lavalier microphones, whereby the opening song, in particular, was much too loud and clipped, which was a shame, considering how sleek the visuals, band music and choreography were. Sound quality was greatly improved by the later use of handheld microphones, though the lavaliers did improve as the show went on. My next major concern is one of cultural appropriation: to observe the white dancers come out wearing headscarves and performing movements of prayer and supplication, exultation and rejoicing, is significantly inappropriate and ought to be reworked. Whilst the objective here was noble and well-intentioned, the result is not to contemporise the song’s meaning and to call for peace and justice in modern times but to play dress-up as a particular sociocultural profile within the context of family entertainment. I urge this be reconsidered.
I would really urge CJ not to refer to himself as a Michael Jackson impersonator [especially so repeatedly]. Whilst his dedicatory messages about continuing Michael Jackson’s legacy and the significance behind Michael Jackson's work as ‘the world’s best entertainer’, as he put it, the effect of this is equally a complete destruction of illusion. Knowing full well that this is not truly Michael Jackson, a recognition only exacerbated by the horrific history of his death, and so already having to suspend our disbelief, it is counter-productive to go through such trouble to develop/learn the choreography, dedicate this performance to him, appear like him, sound like him, and then communicate ‘this is all artifice’. These dedicatory messages, which appear to be central to CJ's work and so need to be included, could be communicated via projections in text form, which would separate them from the world of the stage, or [still not a personal favourite but much better] at the end of the performance, instead of regularly throughout.
Overall, an incredibly enjoyable performance whose video and lighting design complement its dynamism and refinement. Judging by the advertisements alone: of all other Entertainers shows, this is, by far far far, the best of those on offer.
This private analysis has been publicised as per the request of the creatives.
To discover the difference between public and private analyses, please click here.
Request a Performance Analysis
To request your own (public or private) analysis, please click the button below.
-
Commenti